<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:g-custom="http://base.google.com/cns/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>popgoesthe60s</title>
    <link>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com</link>
    <description />
    <atom:link href="https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/feed/rss2" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" />
    <item>
      <title>9 Signs the Beatles Are Breaking Up With You</title>
      <link>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/9-signs-the-beatles-are-breaking-up-with-you</link>
      <description />
      <content:encoded>&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           While infidelity can take many forms, there are common signs that might indicate that the Beatles are cheating on you. Lack of physical connection, sudden changes in communication, secretive behavior – are the red flags of betrayal.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;h3&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
        
            ﻿
           &#xD;
      &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Beatles fans who have been faithful, obedient, and financially supportive of the band for better than a half a century, have recently become suspicious due to the wind down of physical media releases, the cancellation of the 2026 Fest For Beatles Fans (formerly known as BeatleFest), and Apple’s wandering eye for a younger and hotter demographic. These are signs which have left die hard Beatles fans feeling like Cynthia Lennon walking in on John &amp;amp; Yoko.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Like most affairs this one began in cyber space with Apple no longer hiding their intentions to cut ties with slow, aging, overweight analog lovers for young, digital consumers with healthy appetites for apps. Unfortunately, the most dedicated fans are always the last to know, so here are nine signs that the Beatles may be breaking up with you.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           1. Trust Issues 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The Beatles company Apple has released a peculiar string of products that have left fans scratching their heads, wondering why the Rubber Soul Deluxe Box set gets passed over time and time again for repackages of albums everyone already has or doesn’t need. Consequently, fans across social media have voiced their distrust of future Beatles releases.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           2. Lack of Physical Intimacy 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Apple’s new CEO Tom Greene boasts an impressive resume – all of which is in e commerce – not record album collectibles, which are the things Beatles fans cuddle up to on cold nights. Apple is using Beatle philosophy against fans, relieving them of their ties to the material world by going all digital.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           3. Complaints About the Relationship 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Actually, the Beatles don’t complain, they just send their mouth pieces to do it for them. Take 21st Century re-mixologist, Giles Martin, son of Beatles legendary producer George Martin. Giles recently stated in NME News, “It’s been 50-60 years, and yet still people want more. I tell them, ‘Go and listen to the albums.’” This mini rant is an obvious sign of Apple and the Beatles tiring of fan’s insatiable appetite and demand for new Beatles products.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           4. Hints Of A Breakup 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           With a new CEO in place since September, 2025, it’s odd that he has offered only silence with regard to future Beatle plans. This leaves producer-turned-PR-man Giles Martin to clumsily intimate in a November 2025 issue of Uncut Magazine that, “Beatles fans think they own [unreleased material], that it’s their right to have it and it’s not.” Ouch.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           5. They Don’t Crave Your Attention 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Fans have been vocal about what they would like to see released by the Fabs. But all of a sudden their guaranteed old money is not the long term investment Apple is looking for. Costs to produce physical media have drastically increased while streaming offers high exposure with low overhead.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           6. Focus Is Not On Your Needs 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The only project that Apple is comfortable talking about, albeit through Giles Martin, is the forthcoming Sam Mendes 4-part biopic on each individual Beatle due out in 2028. Here’s what Giles had to say in NME News, “I’m working with the actors and they’re doing a really good job, that’s all I can say. The scripts are really good and brave, as opposed to being anodyne.” What, like Beatles music?
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           7. Open Relationships With Other Mediums 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           One would think a single biopic would be enough but four separate films shows an indulgence in pursuit the glitz of Hollywood, the industry notorious for valuing fiction over fact. The truth of the matter is that Apple is chasing the success of Bohemian Rhapsody, a loose telling of Queen front man Freddie Mercury. Audiences didn’t mind the movie was heavily criticized for its use of creative license. “Creative license” meaning, “shit we made up to make it more interesting to a mass audience.”
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Bohemian Rhapsody surprising raked in over $900 million world wide despite a paltry $55 million budget. It set the all-time box office record for the biographical and drama genres and received multiple awards. Do you think Apple is banking on these kind of numbers times four? Why wouldn’t they?
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           8. Flirting with Ai 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The inevitable flirtation with artificial intelligence was rolled out with the release of a “new Beatles single” in 2023. But that’s 53 years after they broke up and two Beatles have passed away, so how can this be? Enter Ai which, loosely defined, was used to create one of the most over-hyped singles of all time. Though the fabrication of the song Now And Then only met with short term success, this trial balloon exposed how easily fan’s emotions were manipulated by Ai-manufactured nostalgia. The result? A crap Lennon demo adorned by the most bland musical trimmings ever laid down by Mssrs. McCartney, Harrison, and Starr. Some aggressive fans went so far to suggest that “if you don’t love it, you don’t have a heart in you,” demonstrating the cult-like power of the new medium.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           9. Lack of Commitment 
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           What is perceived as a lack of commitment is dependent on the length of the relationship. Long time fans have been loyal to the Beatles for 60+ years and as such have come to expect some reciprocity in the relationship. But Apple is no longer dancing with the ones who brought them to the prom leaving fans to sit in folding chairs against the wall of the gym, playing with their wilting corsages.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           How could have it all gone so wrong? Fans who have given their screams, adoration, and hard earned money are being put out to pasture in favor of young fans, some of whom have never even heard of the Beatles. I can see the t-shirts and slogans now: All You Need Is Spotify and Give Ai A Chance!
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           It can feel like the ground is shifting under you as you question everything you knew about your relationship with the Beatles. Fans who have allowed themselves to be vulnerable in the relationship must heal from the loss. Somerset Maugham so eloquently said, “the love that lasts the longest is the love that is never returned.”
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Fans with stronger constitutions may find it better to be single with high standards than in a relationship that lowers them. As writer Jan Glidewell reminds us, “You can clutch the past so tightly to your chest that it leaves your arms too full to embrace the present.”
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           With divorce imminent, it would seem that fans would conceivably be granted alimony, perhaps in the form of the Deluxe Rubber Soul Box set. But with the children all grown, the judge might suggest that each party just let it be.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/cdfff9b3-9770-40be-a0bd-10ba55281118_1920x1080.jpg" length="335899" type="image/jpeg" />
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 15:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/9-signs-the-beatles-are-breaking-up-with-you</guid>
      <g-custom:tags type="string" />
      <media:content medium="image" url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/cdfff9b3-9770-40be-a0bd-10ba55281118_1920x1080.jpg">
        <media:description>thumbnail</media:description>
      </media:content>
      <media:content medium="image" url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/cdfff9b3-9770-40be-a0bd-10ba55281118_1920x1080.jpg">
        <media:description>main image</media:description>
      </media:content>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beatles Collectors Struggle Going Cold Turkey</title>
      <link>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/beatles-collectors-struggle-going-cold-turkey</link>
      <description>Is the future of Beatles fandom devoid of physical, collectible artifacts? 55 years after they stopped making music, the Beatles maintain an enduring fan base who may be disappointed in Apple Corps' digital-heavy direction this Christmas.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The holiday season wouldn’t be complete without the Macy’s Day Parade, a trimmed tree and some sort of new Beatles product for hungry fans. During their heyday, the Beatles always made sure there were new stocking stuffers available for Christmas and 2025 is no different.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           But alas, the new cut of the Beatles Anthology documentary on Disney+ will only be available through their streaming service. How does one put that in a sock? The tradition of actually stuffing something in a stocking and ultimately putting the attractive DVD or expansive box set on the shelves for display, is becoming a thing of the past.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Songs and movies will no longer clog your hard drives and phones because the only place you’ll be able to access them is through streaming services like Spotify, Amazon Prime, or in this case, Disney+.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Disney+, who owns distributing rights for the revised Beatles Anthology documentary, has released a newly updated (but substantially shorter) version with updated photos, cleaned up audio, crisp video, and a more tightly edited story. Beatles fans generally want more Beatles, not less Beatles, and fans were immediately put off by getting two hours less that what was originally released in 1996. Despite this, fans were largely satisfied with the new telling of the Beatles story, which is zippier and is presented in nine easily digestible episodes for future generations to consume. What they are not okay with is not being able to purchase a physical Blu-Ray or DVD of the new release.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Though some naive fans have visions of an extended directors cut on Blu-ray, more realistic fans see this digital-only release as a turning point in Beatles history where physical memorabilia will cease to be produced by the Beatles company Apple. This is a hard concept for 20th century fans to grasp but one must also understand that we live in a strange time where 50% of people purchasing vinyl records do not have a record player. The vinyl resurgence seems to be an exercise in ‘collectorism’ – not media preference – a statistic not lost on corporations like Apple.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The vinyl market which peaked in 2023 has had successive negative sales years since, suggesting that the hipster fad of owning vinyl without actually opening the shrink wrap is fading.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Why would someone purchase a vinyl album without a record player? Simple. There is no need to play something as cumbersome as a record album when one can simply touch a phone app and have it play directly into their Bluetooth earbuds which seem permanently attached to people’s heads. What counts is having the album in their collection and displaying it prominently for vinyl hipster validation. It’s also important to note that over 500 Beatles YouTube channels (an approximate count by ChatGPT) rely on physical product to unbox and display on their channel. Unfortunately most YouTubers don’t have the verbal skills to describe something that exists in digital format alone. Consequently the physical album is a vital crutch for their ‘show and tell’ presentations. Translation: more physical albums means more videos, which leads to more views, and ultimately more money for the content creator.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Diehard Beatles fans, who by and large still have a depression-era mentality of stockpiling pop culture items as if their lives depended on it, are loathe to accept these changing times, clinging to their trinkets as if they “can take their collections with them.”
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The music industry is aware of Beatles fans weakness of will but the dwindling fan base has reached the point such that corporations like Apple can no longer depend on physical media as a means of improving the bottom line. The only Beatles project on the horizon that Apple will admit to is a 4-part biopic on the Beatles due out in 2028. So what will Apple offer in the two and half years until the biopics come out?
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           What they have delivered the last two years has been two video releases available only via streaming on Disney+ (the 1970 film Let It Be and the pitiful Beatles ‘64 documentary), a strange re-imagining of the Beatles Red &amp;amp; Blue Albums (1962-1966 &amp;amp; 1967-1970 Greatest Hits classics), and a ropey ‘final single,’ Now And Then, based on a rough Lennon demo cobbled together by the remaining Beatles. Apple has known all along that fans have been demanding the release of a deluxe box set of Rubber Soul since Revolver: Special Edition was released in fall 2022, but their pleas have fallen on deaf ears.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Beatles fans are keen to point out that there are eight remaining albums that have yet to get the deluxe box set treatment. Any combination of those would all be likely release candidates to fill in the gap between now and the 2028 Sam Mendes biopics, but Apple has been mum on its intentions.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           New CEO Tom Greene’s entire professional background is in the digital space which includes six years with the Harry Potter franchise, growing the Harry Potter Fan Club to over 50 million members and most recently as COO of BLAST, an esports company that includes BLAST.tv and BLAST Premier. In short, there is not one molecule of physical matter for purchase in any of Greene’s past roles, so it’s obvious that the direction Apple intends to go is 100% digital.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Beatles fans, known for their gluttonous appetite for physical product, will soon be on a strict diet of ones and zeros that may tip the scales away from their first world problems toward reflection on the Beatles massive contribution to music and pop culture and why we’re so loyal to them 55 years after they stopped making music.
           &#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/99a58336-e8f4-463b-acd1-67848b935625_1920x1080.jpg" length="256348" type="image/jpeg" />
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 17:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/beatles-collectors-struggle-going-cold-turkey</guid>
      <g-custom:tags type="string" />
      <media:content medium="image" url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/99a58336-e8f4-463b-acd1-67848b935625_1920x1080.jpg">
        <media:description>thumbnail</media:description>
      </media:content>
      <media:content medium="image" url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/99a58336-e8f4-463b-acd1-67848b935625_1920x1080.jpg">
        <media:description>main image</media:description>
      </media:content>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Now And Then" Two Years On</title>
      <link>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/the-beatles-now-and-then</link>
      <description>Now largely forgotten, this Frankenstein mash up of a rough John Lennon demo from 1977 was brought to life via digital tinkering and the blessing of the two remaining Beatles.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           The Beatles Forgotten Final Single
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           As the Beatles try in vain to increase market share with people under the age of 40, one wonders how they will do that with their latest release, Anthology 4. A collection of outtakes and unreleased material from the band’s heyday, this superfluous fourth Anthology set (containing material that wasn’t good enough to make it into volumes 1–3 back in the 1990s), has been given release two years after its logical companion piece, the AI single Now And Then, was released to push the revamped greatest hits compilations, 1962-1966 and 1967-1970, in 2023.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Now And Then? That title rings a bell. Of course – the John Lennon demo that was given the ultimate spit shine to pass as the heralded “Beatles Final Single.” Now largely forgotten and lost in the digital wasteland of the public’s poorly maintained iCloud storage, this Frankenstein mash up of a rough John Lennon demo from 1977 was brought to life via digital tinkering and the blessing of the two remaining Beatles. Though originally derided by George Harrison in the 1990s, Paul McCartney viewed it as his last chance to “collaborate with John.”
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           All the stops were pulled out to make Lennon’s abandoned demo a hit single. After Now And Then was put through the 21st Century pop music machine, the track became a viral hit in November 2023, only to fall off the charts after a few weeks when the novelty had worn off.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Were Beatles fans actually expecting a song on the level of Eleanor Rigby, Strawberry Fields Forever or Here Comes the Sun? Only a fool would expect a “classic” concocted from a rejected 45-year old demo and two 80+year-old rock dinosaurs. But the money invested in the marketing campaign was so effective that fans hastily (and clumsily) called the song “canonical” a day after its release.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Now And Then was released with an unprecedented level of media hype: A mini-documentary on how the song was built was released, followed by the single the next day, and on day three, a music video created by Lord Of the Rings movie director Peter Jackson. Thousands weighed in on social media to join the mass weep-a-thon that played out as people actually cried in their YouTube reaction videos. Thumbnails of over dramatized emotions got maximum clicks. Many held it together long enough to condemn those who didn’t shed tears as “not having a soul.”
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;img src="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/bfd4ad8e-e892-40e5-8372-3d3dd256ec8e_764x569.webp" alt=""/&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Twenty-four months later, after advocates of the song had had a good cry, they collected themselves and moved on from the event, as if Now And Then had never happened.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Case in point: In November 2023, the song entered the Billboard Top 100 Pop Chart at #7, falling to #76 the following week and dropping off the chart entirely a week later. It fared slightly better in the United Kingdom lasting four weeks on the charts before disappearing.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           This quick look at the chart action of the song suggests that the curiosity wore off immediately and the quality of the song, or the lack thereof, didn’t invoke repeated listens. For a single to place at or near the top of the chart the week of release and then drop off so quickly shows that the marketing hype simply couldn’t be sustained for more than a couple of weeks. Great songs don’t need continued marketing; they enjoy long stays on the charts because they catch fire as more and more people listen, re-listen, buy, and share. Now And Then’s chart performance suggests it was quickly abandoned by even the most devoted Beatles fans.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           Separating the Song From the Video
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The brilliance of the marketing campaign focused on archival video, triggering maximum sentiment and making it hard for fans to separate the song from the images in the videos. While many fans conceded that the song was not up to Beatles standards, they admitted to being swept up in a sea of wistful nostalgia, making it difficult to discuss the actual music and lyrics critically.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           A Song As Boring As Its Title
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The incredible speed that AI has advanced since the release of Now And Then has made a relatively new song seem dated in the worst way. The over reliance on software and “artificial intelligence” to enhance Lennon’s vocal gives the song a lack of authenticity. If the Beatles were ever anything, it was authentic.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The production team went to the moon to make the backing track into something worthy of The Beatles. The use of backing vocals from old Beatles songs and McCartney’s ultra bland guitar solo (a poor tribute to Harrison), all fell flat as they tried in vain to elevated the song to the level of magic found in lesser songs from The Beatles vast catalog. Furthermore, McCartney’s obsession with collaborating with the ghost of Lennon exposed his self absorption, spreading himself thin trying to honor both Lennon and Harrison simultaneously.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Also noticeable is the weakness of the lyrics which unveil their triteness and rudimentary rhyming, suggesting they may have been merely place holders for later editing.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Melodically is where the song falters the most with a complete lack of a hook instrumentally or in the melody. Beatles classics were “classics” because they left the listener wanting more. Now And Then is somehow lacking in every musical area all while seeming self-indulgent.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           The strategy of releasing Now And Then as a part of the expanded 1962-1966 and 1967-1970 hits compilation (aka The Red and Blue Albums) was an obvious attempt to maximize the hype to pull in a younger audience, or perhaps to make sure Now And Then got done while two Beatles were still alive. Either way, it was presumptuous to add Now And Then to the Beatles 1967-70 Greatest Hits package, as if it belongs along side monumental works like Penny Lane, Something, or A Day In The Life.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
        
            ﻿
           &#xD;
      &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Fans willingly caught up in the hysteria went so far as to call Now And Then “the perfect way to sum up the Beatles legacy.” But as time will show, a song this trite will never sum up a legacy that large.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           Watch the Video Below:
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           NOW AND THEN and How People React to It
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           Read:
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
            
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
        
                   
           &#xD;
      &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;a href="https://substack.com/@mattwilliamson917813" target="_blank"&gt;&#xD;
      
           Subscribe to Matt Williamson on Substack
          &#xD;
    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
           Watch:
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      
            
          &#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
              
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/@popgoesthe60s52" target="_blank"&gt;&#xD;
      
           Pop Goes the 60s on YouTube
          &#xD;
    &lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;strong&gt;&#xD;
      &lt;br/&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;/strong&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;img src="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/pop-goes60s-logo.png" alt=""/&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div data-rss-type="text"&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;p&gt;&#xD;
    &lt;span&gt;&#xD;
      
           Pop Goes the 60s is dedicated to reviewing and presenting 60s music, both rare and popular, praised and scorned, under appreciated and underrated. This channel will offer regular commentary on the Beatles as well as other groups, both acclaimed and obscure. Album reviews, band histories, vinyl discographies, Albums That Never Were, and song samples, will all be part of a larger focus.
          &#xD;
    &lt;/span&gt;&#xD;
  &lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/5f2bde62-9ce8-4df6-9523-1ec736d724fb_876x494.webp" length="19736" type="image/webp" />
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.popgoesthe60s.com/the-beatles-now-and-then</guid>
      <g-custom:tags type="string">latest posts</g-custom:tags>
      <media:content medium="image" url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/5f2bde62-9ce8-4df6-9523-1ec736d724fb_876x494.webp">
        <media:description>thumbnail</media:description>
      </media:content>
      <media:content medium="image" url="https://irp.cdn-website.com/27c11a59/dms3rep/multi/5f2bde62-9ce8-4df6-9523-1ec736d724fb_876x494.webp">
        <media:description>main image</media:description>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
